I run my ECO at 0.035" without a tune. With the MT there is noticable difference in low RPM power vs. 0.025", regardless of octane.
|
|
I run my ECO at 0.035" without a tune. With the MT there is noticable difference in low RPM power vs. 0.025", regardless of octane.
![]()
2012 ECO MT - Black Granite/Cloth; Bluetooth Stereo AUX; OEM Fogs w/Chrome Covers; GM Spare tire; VG Shark Fin
2010 Mit Lancer GT MT (traded for ECO @31K miles)
2002 Pont Montana AWD (traded for 2012 LS @182K miles)
1990 Pont Transport (traded for Montana @240K miles)
1986 Fiero GT MT (traded for Transport)
1985 Fiero 2M4 MT (traded for Fiero GT @8K miles)
2012 cruze 2 lt rs 1.4l turbo
2 were at .25 , one .23 one .27
i was blown away
they are all .35 now
2012 Cruze RS 1 LT Turbo+ Victory Red
My Build Thread:
http://www.cruzetalk.com/forum/11-ap...-cruze-rs.html
My Switchback LED DIY:
http://www.cruzetalk.com/forum/57-ho...witchback.html
There are 2 types of aircraft: Fighter Jets and Targets :P
Canadian Firepower / Proud to serve.
I just checked my spark plug gaps on our 2012 LT/RS 1.4l and they were all at 0.024 so I bumped them up to 0.032 to see how much of a difference it makes. I found the yellow Lordstown Assembly sheet in the car dated 11/03/11 Time: 01:48:01
XtremeRevolution & Co. Mobile Audio Parts
XtremeRevolution.net
"Dreams move on, when you wait too long..."
- Billy Ray Cyrus
Hey XtremeRevolution,
I checked my plugs today and here are my results.
2012 Cruze 1LT RS 6 Speed Manual
Mods - K&N Typhoon SRI
Also, I always run 93 Octane Fuel
Factory Gap - .022-.023
Re-Gapped Plugs to .035
I have noticed a much better response in throttle and turbo through 1500-4000RPM Range. I try to keep my shifts to about 3500RPM, but I opened her up a little today with the new gaps and wow.. Before if I was in 4-6th and below 2000RPM the motor just did nothing. Now I can go as low as 1400-1500 RPM and the motor now has life.
Checked mine today. 2012 Cruze LTZ
They were as follows:
#1: .026
#2: .027
#3: .027
#4: .026
I changed them all to .035... Haven't had a chance to drive it yet but I'm hoping I will see a difference after all the posts I've read. Will report back if I find any problems.
I wonder if 2013s got fixed. I just checked mine and they we all at .027/.028 (tough to see the exact gap). But either way they we all the same at factory specs. Mine is 2013 eco mt with 1,588 miles
I did the regap on mine yesterday. Mine were all at .027" but I changed it to .032" to see how it does. GM has some of the best ignition systems in the world, so I believe the coils can take the extra gap and not cause any running issues.
I have 2012 ECO A/T, all stock. Plugs where between .024 and .029, used 87 octane. Changed to all .035. Did not notice any big difference. After reading all the posts I determined that a stock 1.4 motor ran best at .028. Changed all to.028 use Shell mid-grade. The car runs great. IN my opinion having your plugs gaped all the same is the most important.--Mike
|
|