Chevrolet Cruze Forums banner

3200 mile long road trip complete in CTD

8K views 40 replies 13 participants last post by  revjpeterson 
#1 ·
I just returned from a much anticipated and highly coveted 9 day road trip from Portland OR to Scottsbluff NE and Spearfish SD. On the way East through Montana it was almost all Interstate driving with some nasty storms but from then on it was all good weather and a mix of highways and interstate.

My 2014 Diesel Cruze now has almost 14K miles and my lifetime MPG is 40. The trip was more like 42 MPG which was good considering how many miles were on delightfully empty 80 MPH speed limited WY and ID freeways.

Unlike some others, I haven't found the seats to be tiring even on long days. I do wish they were more generously proportioned but overall my 210 pound butt had no issues racking up a lot of time in them and my smaller partner had no complaints either. Though I like my 2010 Malibu's premium audio better than the 2014 Cruze Pioneer system, both are really very satisfying in terms of audio quality. The Pioneer system in the Cruze isn't very flexible in that it only sounds full and good from the front seats and if you adjust the fader much you loose a lot of volume but taken at close to factory fader levels and accepting that it is mostly there for front seat passengers, the sound quality, bass and volume available far exceeded anything I would use.

My Link is a frequent source of frustration though mostly minor things. Sometimes navigation lady voice says turn left when the on screen indicator and reality are to turn right... One time during this trip I brought up a point of interest in a list but couldn't get it selected. It would highlight the entry when I selected it via touch or select button but wouldn't go to the next screen to allow me to start guidance etc. I ended up starting over and looking the same POI up via a different method (by name instead of category etc) and then it worked. Nav was used many times on the trip and for the most part it worked well and wasn't annoying. I especially like the settings menu where you can customize how much to fade out your audio when the prompts come on. I set mine to only moderately fade out the music and it seems less jarring and smoother to my ears.

Driving performance wise the car never disappointed. When I bought the vehicle I was really concerned about the Low Rolling Resistance (LRR) tires but between my own experiences and reading about other experiences on the internet I have come to appreciate these long lasting fuel saving tires. I cringe every time I have to drive on gravel since there is no spare tire but on this trip I probably drove 25 miles of well maintained gravel and had no issues. Amongst my friends I have a reputation for being a curvy road enthusiast and the Cruze is able and willing to cling nicely around all manner of curves though I don't think the steering communicates much back to the driver. Over long hours on the freeway, the Cruze CTD's extra quiet ride was a blessing. Though not discussed often, the CTD transmission definitely works to help with engine braking on down grades. Time and time again I could feel and see (tach) the transmission choosing 5th or even 4th on long downhill grades. I tend to like manually shifting on long hills but for the most part I wasn't accomplishing much different than what the car would do anyway except that the transmission seems to downshift when braking whereas I will engage a lower gear prior to needing the brakes. Bottom line, I expect a lot of CTD drivers will see unusually long brake pad life, especially for those who otherwise would never manually intervene in their transmission shifting.

One feature didn't work a few times (but worked a few times also) and that is the remote start. Similar to my Malibu, it seems like the list of parameters that have to be just right is substantial and overall the remote start seems a little moody.

Overall, this was the right vehicle for me and 1 passenger who wanted to cover some truly vast distances in comfort and at minimal fuel cost. Also, anybody who hasn't had a (preferably shoulder season) trip to the Black Hills should really consider it as an amazing road trip destination. Beautiful scenery, amazing geology, great hiking, fun fast and polite driving, inexpensive and very American wide open spaces make the Black Hills of SD and WY a repeat destination for me.
 
See less See more
#3 ·
Awesome report, I agree with you totally except I have the regular stereo system which I think sounds great. Haven't tried it from back seat but I have had passengers say it sounds good. I was so disappointed in my link I don't even use it. I use my cell phone instead. The voice recognition while it's a sweet feature was frustrating, one on my android HTC phone is way better at understanding what you said. Navigation through Google maps I also found to work much better than mylink. Since day 1 the Bluetooth phone connection has been ok if I never kill the car. Often I have many short trips after restart Bluetooth connection would act up, usually sound from phone calls or sound from music playing from phone was ok but I would lose audio on navigation program. So now I connect phone via aux Jack.
The only complaint now other than the wiring being in the way is I can't get the sound volumes the same. To talk on phone I have to turn volume way up when phone conversation ends music playing or navigation giving you instructions suddenly blare s before I can turn it down!

I need to make a trip to the area you mentioned.
 
#4 ·
While I purchased this car for my commute, I have come to almost look forward to taking it on a long road trips.

The car's interior is so quiet and you can drive for hours and hours without having to make a stop. Honestly I usually have to stop for a restroom break long before I run out of fuel.

I have only done a 1200 mile road trip in mine, but the car performed flawlessly. I do sometimes with the car was a tad bigger as I prefer a full size sedan, but for just two people it works great.

I did myself start to get a little tired with the seats, I wish there was a little more bolster into the sides at times.

And as far as SD, I miss that place! My grandparents had a place in Corona, SD and it was so peaceful, you could see the stars for miles. I used to love that you could drive forever and not see a sole, then when you did most folks would wave!
 
#6 ·
Nice writeup. I have a couple comments - first on brakes. I downshift manually whenever I have an opportunity and although it doesn't slow the car down as much as a gasoline engine, it's just fine. I will probably get way over 100K out of my brake pads. Also for the remote start, I do notice it fails once in a while (maybe 5% or less of the time), but if you have a CEL, it will fail 100% of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDog
#7 ·
I have never heard that said before? If I use manual override in my diesel I have to be careful or the petrol cars behind me will run into me. With 2.0L and a compression of 16.5 to 1 engine braking is really good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raffmanlt
#10 ·
I think it's funny people talking about manually downshifting all the time to brake.

Unless I was in like Colorado on a steep long decent and worried about overheating my brakes I will never bother with it.

I just let the car do it's thing. I had to get the automatic since there is no manual option (obviously), so I might as well sit back and not worry about it.
 
#13 ·
I think it's funny people talking about manually downshifting all the time to brake.

Unless I was in like Colorado on a steep long decent and worried about overheating my brakes I will never bother with it.
Well I was in Wyoming and Montana and there were several 6-10 mile 6% down hill sections and one 10% one that was great to go down with almost no braking. Really though the default behavior in the Diesel is pretty good at helping out with braking. I don't remember the 1.4 gas engine transmission helping out much but probably didn't drive those rentals on any really big hills.
 
#17 ·
Haha yeah, I dropped down 3000 ft in ~6 miles this weekend. My car was holding itself around 40-45, but 3rd gear was screaming around 3500-4000 RPM trying to hold it back, and I did have to get on the brakes here and again.

Yeah, diesels aren't known for engine braking. I wonder if the increased engine braking comes from the bigger engine size itself...or from some valve timing tricks the Cruze plays to create a bit of an exhaust brake.
 
#25 ·
raffmanlt Engine braking has been around for many years, I once spoke to an owner driver when it first became popular and he told me that while it did reduce engine life by 20% the brakes lasted 3 times as long with the use of it. With the cost in the 1970's of $2,000 for a brake reline on an 18 wheeler it worked out over the life of the engine as quite a big saving in total running cost.
 
#26 ·
That's true and years ago the trucks came with a handlever brake that only locked trailer brakes. Some trucks still have this. Some people that owned trucks but not trailer used these to slow down so they were not wearing theirs out.
 
#27 ·
I've never destroyed a transmission yet by engine braking, but I always get well over 100K on brake pads. Anyway, the Mercedes GL350 Bluetec, in contrast to the Cruze diesel, has tremendous engine braking. It's very specific to the vehicle. My Cruze diesel does not have very good engine braking at all. It's night and day between the two cars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spacedout
#33 ·
My wife sleeps or does needlework when I drive. Otherwise she gets car sick even on a straight interstate.
 
#34 ·
Diesel wow that is a lot of miles on your brake pads! Where I will be driving and the fact that I want max mpg I for one am very happy that the cruze diesel engine braking is not as good. I get best mpg by looking way down the road and if light changes coasting as long as I can. In a semi with 80,000 lbs pushing you down a hill your life depended on starting slow in a low gear and using as much engine braking as you could. Otherwise your brakes heat up and may catch fire and you can lose them all together a time or two thought I would have to use the runaway ramp. As for car I will coast as much as I can and brakes don't cost much to change.
 
#36 ·
All this debating about diesel V petrol engine braking can be easily settled, drive both type of car to a straight road with duel lanes put them in 3rd gear at 40mph drive side by side and at a given signal lift off the gas, debate settled once and for all. Remember the diesel is a heavier vehicle to start with, so a clear win will be impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diesel
#37 ·
I just took a short trip not as long as yours but it was a road I have traveled off and on for 35 years. What struck me was not only was the trip quieter and smoother than what I am used to but on the hills the diesel went up them effortlessly without needing more throttle and without shifting down. Also there was one curve that normally if you have cruise on all my other cars would suddenly accelerate or shift down right as your going into the curve. It gives you an out of control feeling and you normally hit the brakes to turn off the cruise. This time it did not lose speed going in and maintained speed all of the way. That combined with the fact the cruze seems so planted it was very comfortable going into and through the curve.

I was a little disappointed in mpg since I had it tuned it seems like mpg is better than stock. On this trip I got 44.5 mpg according to dic however although it was mostly highway there were at least 14 stop signs and 3 small towns to go through. So considering that I would say the after tune mpg is at least as good as it was before the tune and it seems it might still be a little better. The mpg in the cruze takes a dive anytime you have to slow down or stop.

The seat was comfortable enough I am hoping it gets better with wear and tear, kind of like breaking in a leather saddle or baseball glove.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top