i have some on a transporter heading my way . when i see one ill take a photo. the new sonic twins look absolutely amazing
Yup - and all the 2017s now have the new EPA testing cycle as well, so it may be something that shows up in the figures now, since the tests are supposed to be more representative.Hatchbacks tend to have slightly lower fuel economy numbers. They're heavier, which lowers the city number, and they're not as aerodynamic if the back is rounded out. A flat back like the Volt is more efficient.
The EPA last changed testing regimens in 2007. It hasn't changed since then. I think Canada switched for 2017 to the EPA's 2007 testing methodology.Yup - and all the 2017s now have the new EPA testing cycle as well, so it may be something that shows up in the figures now, since the tests are supposed to be more representative.
These changes were announced in February of 2015, taking effect for MY17.The EPA last changed testing regimens in 2007. It hasn't changed since then. I think Canada switched for 2017 to the EPA's 2007 testing methodology.
My best so far is about 47 mpg for a whole tank. That was on a road trip to Florida.OP, my hatch doesn't get the economy figures that the sedan owners are posting on here. My car is pretty much in line with what GM advertises.
I am going on a road trip toward the end of August. I am planning on trying to go the speed limit on ONE tank to see what it will do when following posted speed limits which I presume will be 60 the majority of that tank. After that i'm going to go back to my normal driving habits which are go as fast as common sense dictates is safe and minimize my chances of being popped for speeding.