Cuda, the gap specs aren't the problem; it's that our cars are being delivered with incorrectly gapped plugs.
Like a whole new beast. It's not quite as zippy as the 1.4T in the Eco that I drove when I was shopping, but it's a *censored* of a lot snappier now.
Considering the increase in economy and performance we've uniformly seen after regapping, I'd say the former.My question (and really everyone's should be) is are the plugs gapped wrong or is GMs listed spec wrong?
It's the 5/8" spark plug socket and T-40 torx bit.You do this one step at a time, patiently and slowly. I believe it's the smaller of the common spark plug sockets to get it out. You'll also need a torx bit, but I don't remember what size it was. Don't adjust gap with one of those coin looking things; you'll need proper feeler gauges. You might otherwise damage the plug as it's an iridium tip. Once you get the engine cover off, the coil bar is right in the center with the two bolts that need removing, and you can wiggle it right out (again, patiently and slowly). Check inside the boots to make sure the springs didn't bind, and proceed to the spark plugs.
Adjusting the gap, assuming you have the tools, costs nothing but maybe 15 minutes of your time. The gap tool shouldn't cost more than $3 or so at Pep Boys, Autozone, etc.How much does that cost
Sent from my PC36100 using AutoGuide.Com Free App
Beg to differ. You can certainly use a 27, but 40 is more snug and doesn't slop around like a 27 or 30. Yes, even on the drums.Actually it's a T-27 torx (same size that you use for your rear brake drum screw removal).
So we have the plug manufacturer saying one number and the car manufacturer saying something else. That's not encouraging.I just called NGK and they said that this plug was made specific for the 1.4 and the correct gap is indeed .027. He also stated that the ignition system wasn't designed for a larger gap due to resistance and the variable timing. I have a few calls in to local dealers also.
If your idea of fun is two engineers and a CSR all screaming epithets at each other, sure.Then, have your dealer's service department on the line while you do this so NGK can explain to them why they're wrong and should instead be gapping the plugs to .027 instead of what AllData and GM's service manual states. If you could get GM's customer service on the line, you might have some fun as well.
What's really funny (as in weird, not lol) about that is, I just looked in my owner's manual and it calls out .028 for both engines. Someone, maybe multiple someones, dun goof'd.GM didn't specify a .025 spec anywhere. That was Vince's idea. GM paid NGK to spec to .028 on all motors. GM's service manual states .033-.037 for the 1.4T and .028 for the 1.8N/A.
The owner's manual states .028. The service manual states .033-.037. And looking back over the thread, you can see that a lot of us have plugs that weren't set to .028 in the first place.Well the manual states 0.028" spark plug gap. NGK set them to 0.027" gap. Looks like they are close to spec to me.
In any technical endeavour, there's engineering (what *should* happen), manufacturing (what *does* happen), and tech writers (what happened?).People shouldn't be having toxic coolant leaks into their cabin, the struts should never have started popping, the drum brakes should not have been "adjusted" to zero, the paint behind the rear doors should never have started chipping, the clutches up till November 2011 should never have been failing...
I and many others here can go on, and on, and on...