Chevrolet Cruze Forums banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
The next-generation of GM's full-size SUVs—the Cadillac Escalade, GMC Yukon, and Chevrolet Suburban—will all launch next year and their importance cannot be understated.

GM CEO Mary Barra confirmed the new versions of the profitable trio will come to market in 2020 but would not give exact timing, nor would she say if they will be delayed somewhat by the six-week UAW strike that recently ended with the ratification of a new four-year labor contract.
The big SUVs are much anticipated. Ever since Lincoln put out its new Navigator, expectations have been high for the 2021 Cadillac Escalade. Executives have promised the fifth-generation car will be worth the wait.
GM needs to get them right. These large, body-on-frame, three-row SUVs are critical to GM's bottom line and their profits help fund the high-tech electric and autonomous vehicle development that's already underway. They are also crucial because of their iconic nature; they help define their brands. The blinged-up Escalade became the company's flagship at a time when other brands had large sedans in that role. The Escalade also made Cadillac cool, and the brand needs an injection of that as it struggles to rebuild its portfolio and reputation.


There has been criticism that the styling of the smaller three-row Cadillac XT6 crossover is bland when compared with its Lincoln Aviator counterpart. But some compromises were made during XT6 development, which shares its underpinnings with the XT5. The new Escalade has had high priority status and the resources that come with it.


The giant grille on the 2021 Escalade, as revealed in spy shots, shows a family resemblance to the new CT4 and CT5 sedans. The hope is the Escalade's exterior will be more dramatic than the XT6 and that interior design and materials will be dramatically improved over its smaller brother.

There will be more than one powertrain, including an updated version of the 6.2-liter V-8 that's already in the flagship Caddy. Early plans to give the Escalade the 4.2-liter twin-turbocharged Blackwing V-8 engine were shelved. Performance or V versions of the Escalade are expected to have a version of GM's 6.2-liter supercharged small block V-8. Spy shots have revealed paddle shifters on the steering wheel for the first time in the Escalade.
We expect the addition of motors and batteries at some point since GM has designated Cadillac as their leading brand for electrification. Barra said GM, overall, will spend more on vehicles with electric powertrains than combustion engines over the next five years with the goal of being the automotive leader in electric vehicles.
The Escalade will also have Cadillac's Super Cruise, the hands-free cruise control system for highway driving.

Once again there will be regular and stretched versions of the Escalade, Yukon and Suburban. The launch will be complicated with downtime at the plants in the first quarter of next year to retool for vehicles that have been changed significantly from their predecessors.
Confirmation of the rollout of the big SUVs came during GM's third-quarter earnings call with investors. In addition to some possible tweaks to launch timing—the new Chevy Corvette might also launch a bit later than planned—the six-week strike will cost GM almost $3 billion in lost earnings over the course of the year, with the first $1 billion in losses already in the books.
The fourth quarter will be worse because the strike, which started Sept. 16, led to the shutdown of U.S. plants, and idled many operations in Canada and Mexico before employees returned to work. The new four-year contract includes signing bonuses, pay increases, preserves benefits, and allows for more part-time workers to become full-time.
The agreement is estimated to increase GM's annual labor costs by $100 million but allows the automaker to close plants in Lordstown, Ohio, Warren Transmission in Michigan, and Baltimore Operations in Maryland. But plans to close the Detroit-Hamtramck plant near Detroit were reversed and GM instead is investing $3 billion to build electric pickups, vans, and battery modules there as part of a larger promise to invest $7.7 billion in U.S. factories over the next four years.

GM reported $2.3 billion in earnings in the third quarter, which is down 9 percent from the same period in 2018. Revenue declined slightly to $35.5 billion. While the strike hurts the bottom line now, and overall labor costs will increase, Barra said the goal was to reach an agreement that is good for employees without compromising the future of the company and shareholder value. She said she feels this deal does that.
GM will look for ways to further cut costs to pay for the decision to keep the Hamtramck plant open, and while most plants are at capacity they will try to find ways to make up for lost production during the strike.
Heavy-duty pickups with crew cabs launched during the third quarter and the rollout will continue with double cabs to be added next, followed by regular cab.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
439 Posts
I really think it was a mistake to kill the new Cadillac V8. It could have been one of the factors to set the Escalade apart.
 

·
Premium Member
2014 Cruze Diesel, 2007 Cobalt, 1981 Camaro Z28, 2017 Volt
Joined
·
4,308 Posts
I really think it was a mistake to kill the new Cadillac V8. It could have been one of the factors to set the Escalade apart.
I don't. The engine cost far too much to develop, and ended up being extremely underwhelming - especially when you consider the redline is similar to that in my smog-era 305 small block. The per-unit cost is absolutely absurd, especially when you compare it to the more powerful LT4. We're talking about a factor of around 20.

It was a waste of money to even continue pursuing this engine in the first place - they're best to cut their losses and go back to the SBC which does a far better job for far less money and sounds freaking insane while doing it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
439 Posts
I don't. The engine cost far too much to develop, and ended up being extremely underwhelming - especially when you consider the redline is similar to that in my smog-era 305 small block. The per-unit cost is absolutely absurd, especially when you compare it to the more powerful LT4. We're talking about a factor of around 20.

It was a waste of money to even continue pursuing this engine in the first place - they're best to cut their losses and go back to the SBC which does a far better job for far less money and sounds freaking insane while doing it.
I must be misinformed then. I was under the impression that the new motor was much more powerful then the 6.2. I agree it would not make more sense to use this engine if it did not have any benefits.
 

·
Premium Member
2014 Cruze Diesel, 2007 Cobalt, 1981 Camaro Z28, 2017 Volt
Joined
·
4,308 Posts
I must be misinformed then. I was under the impression that the new motor was much more powerful then the 6.2. I agree it would not make more sense to use this engine if it did not have any benefits.
Yeah, the LTA (Blackwing, 4.2L DOHC TT V8) makes 550HP and 640 lb-ft of torque in the CT6-V, while the LT4 (6.2L OHV SC V8) makes 640HP and 630lb-ft of torque (in the CTS-V, it makes 650/650 in the Camaro ZL1 and Corvette Z06).

Worse yet - the DOHC Blackwing, in theory, should have been far happier at higher RPM - but it has a ~500 RPM lower redline. The thing redlines at 6k - that's it. The LT4 has a 0.072" longer stroke and revs higher and makes more power despite having two less valves (usually a benefit of DOHC vs Pushrods, but clearly not in this case). The hot-Vee design absolutely chokes the thing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
561 Posts
Man the things I wouldn't do for a later model CTS-V ??
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top