Chevrolet Cruze Forums banner

Car and Driver: Mileage? No, it's Your Gallonage that Really Counts

2275 Views 4 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  Quazar
Ok, I'm 7 years late posting this...
I was cleaning up my old magazines and found this article.

Mileage? No, it's Your Gallonage that Really Counts - Column - Auto Reviews - Car and Driver

There's a sneaky illusion in mpg numbers. Consider: If your pickup rated at 10 mpg gets only 9, you shrug and say it's off only 1 mpg. But if you drive a hybrid labeled 50 mpg and it drops the same 10 percent to 45, you complain of lousy mileage.

The illusion tricks you once again when you think of mpg instead of the fuel you actually burn. Hybrids are chosen by people who think saving gas is right up there on the list of American virtues with motherhood and voting. But when the hybrid gets 45 mpg instead of the expected 50, a 100-mile trip consumes less than a quarter of a gallon more than expected. Compare that with the pickup that gets 9 mpg instead of 10; its 100-mile trip burns 1.1 extra gallons.

The loss of 10 percent on the pickup's mileage actually burns five times the extra gas used by the 10-percent shortfall in the hybrid...
Just something to keep in mind if you encounter a "big" mileage drop (e.g. a 10% drop from 35 mpg to 31.5 mpg") in the winter...

Since the article was from 04, it was written prior to the addition of 3 more cycles to make make the EPA test harsher. The test changes went into effect starting w/model year 08.
See less See more
1 - 1 of 5 Posts
I like the MPG rating over the Miles/100 system. I think it keeps automotive companies more honest. I think if auto companies were allowed they would use gallons per 1000 miles, because the larger the number, the smaller the apparent variance and the less important it seems.
1 - 1 of 5 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top