I don't foresee this being the case. Unless GM decides to shuffle up the option availability and packages for the Eco line, as it stands, you can't get rear discs, leather or a moon roof (as a few examples) on the Eco from the factory.However, the other question is how "top trimmed" they make the Eco-D. They can easily put some more options on it like the discs and leather and push it past LTZ territory.
*shrug* The drums stop my LS just fine, I don't like leather, and a moon/sunroof in Phoenix is a good way to get yourself roasted.I don't foresee this being the case. Unless GM decides to shuffle up the option availability and packages for the Eco line, as it stands, you can't get rear discs, leather or a moon roof (as a few examples) on the Eco from the factory.
Yep! the drums are actually massive for a passenger car. They stop the car perfectly well (when adjusted correctly, which they are far from being out of the factory). Considering they only do 20% of your braking, the fact that they aren't discs is really a non-issue. Even if they were discs, they wouldn't be vented.*shrug* The drums stop my LS just fine, I don't like leather, and a moon/sunroof in Phoenix is a good way to get yourself roasted.
I tow a 1,000 lb. camper, which can cause brake fade on long grades.The only time drums will give you an issue is if you have to make repeated emergency stops from very high speeds. However, as P. J. O'Rourke once said with regard to 4-wheel drum brakes, "if you have to make repeated emergency stops, you have a problem bigger than your brakes."
Not really. The rotor is heavier than the drum, but the brake caliper is heavier than drum brake hardware. Call it a wash.Aren't discs lighter than drums? That would seem like a logical consideration for an car designed for mpgs.
YMMV, of course. I like options that add functionality, not just looks. I'm pretty much deaf from having been a firearms instructor, F-16 mechanic, and programmer in an industrial band, so premium audio is wasted on me. I'd like to have DVD nav, though.No moon roof? What about premium sound? This is concerning. I don't think I'd get the diesel Cruze if it didn't come with premium options. I can do without leather, but I like most of the other stuff.
Not to sound sarcastic, but why not downshift instead of riding your brakes?I tow a 1,000 lb. camper, which can cause brake fade on long grades.
Of course I downshift. But like most people, I also tend to go camping in mountainous areas. Lots of hills. Shifting can't do it all with trailer and a car full of gear. I was just pointing out that there are other situations besides frequent emergency stops that can cause brake fade....Not to sound sarcastic, but why not downshift instead of riding your brakes?
I'm probably kind of an oddball in the market these days. I like my econo-boxes fully loaded. I'm not surprised that reality doesn't necessarily match my expectationsYMMV, of course. I like options that add functionality, not just looks. I'm pretty much deaf from having been a firearms instructor, F-16 mechanic, and programmer in an industrial band, so premium audio is wasted on me. I'd like to have DVD nav, though.
Those are some good points thanks. I know the rotors and calipers are hefty, but on the rear wheels they tend to be relatively small. Maybe 1/3 the size of the front. The point about the drag is a good one though. I never thought of that.from what i have read the drums have 0 drag where a disc brake has a slight drag on it even when the brakes are released. i think the drum brakes are the right choice for a car that is trying to get the best mileage it can. i dont know about the weight but having worked on both i think the drums might be a little less weight. drum vs disk is close to the same but a caliper and caliper bracket is kinda heavy where the slave cylinder in a drum brake is tiny. also you dont have the redundant brake set up for the parking brake to work.
Point taken. However, if someone is going to get the sunroof anyway, then I don't necessarily see a contradiction with a higher-mileage engine and the sunroof. They're just getting the sunroof with the higher mileage engine instead of the sunroof with the lower-mileage engine.....same goes for the sunroof. why go to extremes trying to drop weight and then add in a sunroof. a sunroof is heavy. in the drag racing world many serious racers look for cars without sunroofs just to save the extra weight.
I think the preference sometimes depends on where you live. I live in a place that's cool and cloudy much of the year. So I like both the extra light and the ability to enjoy the sunny days I get.i hate sunroofs anyways. just let in the heat.
I was going by the assumption that in other lines, the diesel option is the top trim. I don't see why Chevy wouldn't look into this. VW TDIs because you already pay a premium have all the extra top trim options. Logic: "I have to pay as much as an LTZ for the diesel engine, I may as well get leather, discs, etc." The diesel isn't exactly a budget saving MSRP.I don't foresee this being the case. Unless GM decides to shuffle up the option availability and packages for the Eco line, as it stands, you can't get rear discs, leather or a moon roof (as a few examples) on the Eco from the factory.
Don't you just... close it? -_- It has the ability to close from both the inside and the outside so I don't know how heat is getting in.i hate sunroofs anyways. just let in the heat.
What's the point of a sunroof that you never open?Don't you just... close it? -_- It has the ability to close from both the inside and the outside so I don't know how heat is getting in.
Downshifting is nearly useless in the Cruze in higher grades. It doesn't do enough to actually slow the car down.Not really. The rotor is heavier than the drum, but the brake caliper is heavier than drum brake hardware. Call it a wash.
YMMV, of course. I like options that add functionality, not just looks. I'm pretty much deaf from having been a firearms instructor, F-16 mechanic, and programmer in an industrial band, so premium audio is wasted on me. I'd like to have DVD nav, though.
Not to sound sarcastic, but why not downshift instead of riding your brakes?
It's there to make your life interesting should the drains ever start to leak. Also there to jack up your insurance rates as it's another break-in entry point in your car.What's the point of a sunroof that you never open?
Diesels, pretty much by definition, have a buttload more torque than gasoline engines. I can see GM approving maybe 500#, depending on frame strength.FWIW, GM specifically states that Eco Cruzes NOT pull any trailers of any size or weight.
Maybe (?) the Eco-D Cruze will be different...or not?!?
Diesels, pretty much by definition, have a buttload more torque than gasoline engines. I can see GM approving maybe 500#, depending on frame strength.
Well, a blanket towing prohibition would be a definite deal-breaker for me. I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens. I don't tow very much weight or very often, but I do need to be able to do so 2 or 3 times per year.FWIW, GM specifically states that Eco Cruzes NOT pull any trailers of any size or weight.
Maybe (?) the Eco-D Cruze will be different...or not?!?
Usually you tow in lower gear (i.e. not overdrive) and usually an automatic is better for towing than an stick, but I was thinking that it could be a transmission issue. Perhaps the Eco transmission can't handle the stresses of shifting with the extra load....the "no-tow" limitation might be a combination of: (a) Eco engine-torque vs. engine-speed (ie: transmission/axle gearing) factory retuning and/or (b) lack of physical frame strength for hitch mounting.