[SilverCruzer]

I haven't check that specifically, but I have noticed that the MPG calculation is if off compared to manual calculation (tank up, set trip odometer to zero, tank up, divide the odometer miles by the gas put in).
I have checked about five tanks now, and the variation has been between 99% to 90% (the computer being more optimistic).
In my previous 2011 Cruze, I checked it about seven times and it was around 97% each time.

 

[SilverCruzer]

Don't read this:

Speedometer Scandal! - Feature - Car and Driver

" GM's domestic products are the most accurate" So I guess the question is, which of the two in this domestic GM car is the most accurate one?

 

[SilverCruzer]

Both of mine (2012/2016) have consistently been 1.5-3 MPG off the manual calculation.

Its just odd that Gen 1 was consistently off 97%, but Gen 2 varies 90% to 99%.
At least with Gen 2, if I assume the 90% all the time, my MPG for my commute is still better than Gen 1 at 97%. (39 mpg vs. 37 mpg) so even if the computer is off, Gen 2 is still a better car MPG for my driving.

 

[SilverCruzer]

I am driving a 2018 Equinox for the time being.

Do you like it? How is the pick up or acceleration? How would you compare the driving of that body with a 1.5 and the Cruze with a 1.4?