Good to know. So as long as the oil shows the Dexos spec and is full synthetic, I'm good to go? I know there are some synthetic blends that are Dexos approved, but I plan on avoiding those. I'll also hop up to 89 octane from now on.
Yes.Castrol Magnatec 5w30 was semi-synthetic, and Dexos approved. Now it looks like it's full synthetic. 520 was already that way, wonder if GM is requiring Dexos oil to be full synthetic now
Yes to both theories and too high final gear ratio causing high engine loading when accelerating.That's a theory. Tune or something inherent in the engine/intake design causing that particular cylinder to run leaner or hotter than others is another theory. Seems odd that it's #1 in particular, when the Gen 1 1.4T would seemingly break pistons at random when it happened.
Gearing's fine...in fact, I'd prefer it to be slightly taller like it is on Ford's 6F35 (shares the same ratios, but final drive is taller). Shift logic might need work, though - it likes to lug around in as high a gear as possible and only really downshifts if you boot it.Yes to both theories and too high final gear ratio causing high engine loading when accelerating.
The problem has more than one cause....Gearing's fine...in fact, I'd prefer it to be slightly taller like it is on Ford's 6F35 (shares the same ratios, but final drive is taller). Shift logic might need work, though - it likes to lug around in as high a gear as possible and only really downshifts if you boot it.
Not really. There's 1 OD ratio in the AT and the rest are quite short. The picking a higher gear when accelerating at low throttle openings is programming. Ford and GM have used this same transmission design in many cars over the years, often with a taller final drive ratio that lets for lower highway/4th gear passing RPM.The problem has more than one cause....
Yes, really, and you just stated so. Of course, a better quality piston should have been used as well.Not really. There's 1 OD ratio in the AT and the rest are quite short. The picking a higher gear when accelerating at low throttle openings is programming. Ford and GM have used this same transmission design in many cars over the years, often with a taller final drive ratio that lets for lower highway/4th gear passing RPM.
Fords 1.5/2.0 Ecoboosts don't seem to have LSPI issues, but they love to rev, run rich air/fuel mixtures, and definitely have programming that doesn't lug around in high gears when accelerating.
I am one of the people that reported on another thread that there is a computer reprogram in the works for the 2016. I have gone through 2 02 sensors due to soot covering them and leading to lean conditions in cylinder 1. My fuel trim was at -17 the last time I took it in for th po15b check engine light. I am afraid of piston damage and my service advisor has been great about getting on GM, but I was told at the end of May that they were working on the programming/fix and here we are two months later with no fix.Honestly, they are so new that we don't really know how the long-term reliability for this particular powertrain will pan out - the new small engine family (1.0/1.4T/1.5T) is a clean-sheet redesign. You probably have some of the higher-mileage 2016.5/2017s out there. It's an all-new engine design, and GM seems to be still investigating the cause of the failures. I have heard rumors that there may be a service bulletin or recall for the LE2 engines in the works similar to the Malibu, along with redesigned pistons, but nothing confirmed yet.
I am one of the people that reported on another thread that there is a computer reprogram in the works for the 2016. I have gone through 2 02 sensors due to soot covering them and leading to lean conditions in cylinder 1. My fuel trim was at
this is exactly what happened with my girlfriends Gen2 she had four 02 sensors replaced, and then boom cyl #1 went