looking at your spreadsheet, seems we should also be recording model years also. My 2012 was .019,.024,.025,.024
InsaneSpeed Steve |
sciphi |
garrettb1 |
Rosstude |
wilde74k |
rlw1224 |
crazylegs |
ozman2005 |
audiobahnman |
calintz |
charlie_t |
cecaa850 |
Chevyderek72 |
Ian_12 |
whatsstuckk5 |
XtremeRevolution |
coinneach |
tecollins1 |
Beachernaut |
Red Dragon |
twin1987 |
churdler |
Vetterin |
UR2N0Z |
Higgs Boson |
silverram323 |
OnlyTaurus |
jblackburn |
H3LLON3ARTH |
SlvrECObullet |
Campuscop2003 |
haoleboy |
weimerrj |
UpstateNYBill |
EcoCruzer |
danimal |
Wow. Those are all much lower than the average, and the 2nd person who has reported a .019 gap. How's it run now?
Would love to hear if you noticed any difference in your car, I bet it revs up quicker & has a much smoother idle & throttle response. GM should be checking all cars with as many of these that are out of spec.Well i checked mine today and there gap was all .019 so i regapped them all to .035 and i have a 2011eco mt