It would be nice to know if the engines are 1.8 or 1.4T as well. This may give us an idea about the severity of the problem for each engine.
InsaneSpeed Steve |
sciphi |
garrettb1 |
Rosstude |
wilde74k |
rlw1224 |
crazylegs |
ozman2005 |
audiobahnman |
calintz |
charlie_t |
cecaa850 |
Chevyderek72 |
Ian_12 |
whatsstuckk5 |
XtremeRevolution |
coinneach |
tecollins1 |
Beachernaut |
Red Dragon |
twin1987 |
churdler |
Vetterin |
UR2N0Z |
Higgs Boson |
silverram323 |
OnlyTaurus |
jblackburn |
H3LLON3ARTH |
SlvrECObullet |
Campuscop2003 |
haoleboy |
weimerrj |
UpstateNYBill |
EcoCruzer |
danimal |
It would be nice to know if the engines are 1.8 or 1.4T as well. This may give us an idea about the severity of the problem for each engine.Good suggestion.
If those who have already reported their numbers would provide the year of their vehicle, I can certainly have that added to the spreadsheet. I will add those values for all newly reported gaps.
Agreed. There are now enough plugs (> 100) in the chart to start doing statistical analysis, but I think just seeing it graphically is sufficient. It also appears NGK was given the same spec for both the 1.4T and 1.8 engines, which makes me wonder if they shouldn't both be 0.035 +- 0.002, despite what both the owners manual and the GM service manuals say.That visual graph sure makes it look like NGK thought they were supposed to be .025, and there were serious quality control problems on top of that.
I would go with the 0.035" what's in the GM maintainence manual. It's more current than the owners manual.Checked today, 5/28/12:
2012 Cruze Eco 1.4, AT, 5800 miles: .028, .026, .028, .028. Only adjusted the .026 to .028. Now all in line with specs per the manual.
The US spec is currently 0.028" - I saw this myself in the on-line service manual at my dealership. According to AC Delco Australia the overseas spec, converted to inches is 0.0315.Just did mine today. All four were at .025. I re-gaped to .031. Should I go to .035?
2012 cruze ls
So either GM has done nothing or there are still misgapped plugs in the supply line. My bets are on both.I just finished doing my spark plugs. All 4 were gapped at .025. I have regapped them all to .035. My car was built 3 weeks ago.
NGK would only have blame for the inconsistency in gaps. It really appears GM gave the wrong spec to NGK. As for GM, they know about it. That's one of the reasons GM set up their Social Media unit - to let GM corporate know when owners of GM products find problems with their cars. Note to Stacy - this isn't a ding on your being here, just an observation on the mission of GM's Social Media unit. Whether or not GM will do anything unless the media gets involved is a different question entirely.this point i doubt gm knows enough about it yet. Your best bet is to just gap them your slef and make sure your dealership knows about it. I printed this forum out and brought it to my dealership and they offered to regap them for free. I had already done it so it doesnt matter. The dealership let me know the process on how these things work and how slow the message would get to GM. R&D made sure the cars run, which they do. NGK has alot of the balme in my mind, in fact i messaged them and havent heard anything back yet.
Hoon,Just checked mine (2012 1LT).
.025-.026 across the board.
Regapped to .028
Are you going to add "GM Engineer" 0.025 x 4 to your spreadsheet? Just a thought. I suspect and hope Mr. Read has pulled up CT and read through, and possibly printed, the threads concerning spark plug gap.I'm liking this Tom Read guy. He seems to prefer to respond to me via phone instead of email, and promptly at that.
He spoke to two service engineers who owned Chevy Cruzes, and they went out and checked the gap on their cars, then came back. One of them gave him exact specs, and said that they were at .025". Basically, GM now knows there's a big issue when their own engineers can confirm it with their own cars. He told me they have a lot of people working on this issue right now, investigating the assembly line as well as dealing with vendors to determine where the problem is. He mentioned a conference call he had in a few minutes regarding this very issue, so safe to say, my conversations with him have definitely created a great deal of exposure.
Thanks again to everyone who took the time to measure and report their spark plug gaps back. The spreadsheet I was able to put together with that information really helped push for an investigation. Now that the issue is confirmed internally, this should get interesting.
I also reminded him about the automatic transmission spec, and he said he'll ask about that as well in his next meeting.
100% agree unless GM Powertrain can provide an engineering answer as to why the North American 1.4T Cruzen should be at 0.028 while the Holden 1.4T Cruzen are at 0.035.Good news! It's nice when you actually find someone in the chain of bureaucracy that can actually accomplish something, isn't it?
Reminds me of having to deal with Verizon at times...trying to get someone that actually knows what they're doing on the other end of the phone.
I'd be interested to know what they determine the preset gap is supposed to be, but I definitely won't be changing my plugs back. It runs swimmingly well on .035", so much so that I have gotten used to shifting under 2000 RPM most of the time around town and can be in 5th or 6th gear at 35 mph.
Before I was driving it like I thought was normal for a 1.4 liter 4-cylinder (and most other small 4-cylinders I've driven without a turbo) - at 3000 RPM or above. I still do when I need to keep up with faster traffic, but I feel like I have to push the car much less now, even with the AC running.
Do you by any chance have the all wheel drive Holden Cruze? That was the only cruze to use 1.1mm spark plug gaps.@Xtreme: I've re-gapped the spark plugs to 0.038" (my stock is 0.044"). For the low speed, it is better than stock gap, but for middle and high speed, it lacks power in comparison with stock gap, so that I turn back to stock gap. I found in Google that, more wider gap (in limitation) will have more electric.
I think that before regapping the gap, it is necessary to consider which type of spark plug, because some car use different type of spark plugs. If default gap is more than 0.038", there is no need to regap spark plugs, but if default gap is below 0.03", it is better to regap spark plugs. My car uses NGK ZFR6U-11, and I think that 1.4L will use another type.
In a nutshell, if you have a tune, gap to 0.028". Otherwise the current GM Service manual says 0.035" +/- 0.05mm. GM is working on this issue and may come back and say 0.028" for all North American Cruzen, however.has anyone read this thread from Vince at trifecta?
So... What exactly is the spark plug gap supposed to be on the 1.4 turbo?? - 1.4L Turbo (LUJ, LUV) and 1.6L Turbo (LLU) - WOT-Tuning.com
what are your guy's thoughts? i want to check to make sure my gaps are correct on my new car but it seems like it should be .028 not .035.