It's no secret to the diesel owners that the diesel comes with no spare tire due to the DEF tank residing where the spare tire does on other Cruze models. However, all along I have kept reading in reviews how while the gas Cruze comes with a relatively large-for-its-class 15.0 cu.ft. trunk, the diesel model gets a more average 13.3 cu.ft. trunk.
Having seen the inside of the trunk several times before I bought one, I concluded they must be including the spare tire well in the trunk space measurement as I could find no discernible difference otherwise, effectively making the trunk the same size as any other Cruze.
However, it appears to me this is not the case, and I'm surprised it took me this long to notice, but it appears the protective layer between the trunk carpet lining and the DEF tank adds maybe in an inch or two to the bottom of the trunk floor making the trunk ever so slightly shallower, especially towards the rear. It you look in the back right (passenger side) corner in the trunk, it is more apparent where the added floor height comes in. Is this what contributes towards the loss of 1.7 cu.ft. of trunk space in the diesel?
Honestly, it really isn't that big of deal to me. I've probably filled my trunk to the brim twice in it's life, and the Pioneer speakers in the rear deck have probably done more to effectively limit my trunk space than the diesel changes.
Having seen the inside of the trunk several times before I bought one, I concluded they must be including the spare tire well in the trunk space measurement as I could find no discernible difference otherwise, effectively making the trunk the same size as any other Cruze.
However, it appears to me this is not the case, and I'm surprised it took me this long to notice, but it appears the protective layer between the trunk carpet lining and the DEF tank adds maybe in an inch or two to the bottom of the trunk floor making the trunk ever so slightly shallower, especially towards the rear. It you look in the back right (passenger side) corner in the trunk, it is more apparent where the added floor height comes in. Is this what contributes towards the loss of 1.7 cu.ft. of trunk space in the diesel?
Honestly, it really isn't that big of deal to me. I've probably filled my trunk to the brim twice in it's life, and the Pioneer speakers in the rear deck have probably done more to effectively limit my trunk space than the diesel changes.